Evaluate the characteristics and factors related to the amputation rate in electric burn patients at Cho Ray Hospital

Ngo Duc Hiep1,, Pham Phuoc Tien1, Vo Thanh Phong1
1 Cho Ray Hospital

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the characteristics, treatment outcomes, and factors related to the amputation rate in electric burn patients at Cho Ray Hospital.
Subjects and methods: A retrospective study on 402 inpatients with electric burns treated at the Burn and Plastic Surgery Department of Cho Ray Hospital from January 2020 to December 2022.
Results: The amputation rate in electric burn patients was 34.3%. The majority of patients who underwent amputation had deep burns with a body surface area of less than 20%. The mortality rate in amputated electric burn patients was 2.2%, lower than in non-amputated patients (p < 0.01). However, amputated patients had a higher number of surgeries and longer hospital stays compared to non-amputated patients (p < 0.01). Additionally, amputated patients had a lower rate of infection shock compared to non-amputated patients (p = 0.02). Advanced age and large surface area of deep burns were independent factors associated with the amputation rate in electric burn patients.
Conclusion: The amputation rate among patients with electrical burns is 34.3%. The amputated group underwent more surgical procedures and had a longer treatment duration; however, they had lower rates of mortality and septic shock compared to the non-amputated group. Advanced age and larger areas of deep burns are independent risk factors that increase the likelihood of limb amputation.

Article Details

References

1. Hưng N. T., Lâm N. N., Nghiên cứu đặc điểm và các yếu tố liên quan đến tỷ lệ cắt cụt chi ở bệnh nhân bỏng, Tạp chí Y dược học Quân sự (2022), tr. 88-94, 47 (2).
2. Hưng N. T., Lâm N. N., Đức N. M., So sánh đặc điểm và kết quả điều trị bỏng điện cao thế và hạ thế, Tạp chí Y học Thảm hoạ và Bỏng (2021), pp. 18-23, (5).
3. Thảo M. X., Đặc điểm bỏng người lớn và thách thức trong điều trị, Tạp chí Y học Thảm hoạ và Bỏng (2021), tr. 19-29, (4).
4. WHO. Burn. 2023; Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/burns.
5. Abebe M. W., Ewing E. L., Weldemicheal H. A. J. P., et al., Electrical burn and amputations in a burn center in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, (2024), pp. e5566, 12 (2).
6. Al-Benna S., Electrical burns in adults, Acta chirurgiae plasticae (2023), pp. 66-69, 65 (2).
7. Gandhi G., Parashar A., Sharma R. K. J. W. J. O. C. C. M., Epidemiology of electrical burns and its impact on quality of life-the developing world scenario, (2022), pp. 58, 11 (1).
8. Khor D., AlQasas T., Galet C., et al., Electrical injuries and outcomes: A retrospective review, (2023), pp. 1739-1744, 49 (7).
9. Kim E., Wan B., Solis-Beach K. J., et al., Outcomes of Patients with Amputation following Electrical Burn Injuries, (2023), pp. 318-329, 4 (3).
10. Hidayati C. A., Saputro I. D., Hutagalung M. R., Could fasciotomy prevent amputation in patients with electrical burn injuries? Insights from a cross-sectional study in Indonesia, Narra J (2024), pp. e834, 4 (2).
11. Bartley C. N., Atwell K., Purcell L., et al., Amputation Following Burn Injury, J Burn Care Res (2019), pp. 430-436, 40 (4).