Article Sidebar

article details
Date Published: 28/08/2024
Online Published: 28/08/2024
Abstract Views: 49
Views article details: 20
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54804/yhthvb.4.2024.353
Issue
No. 4 (2024)
Section
Articles
How to Cite
Vo, V. H., & Vu, Q. V. (2024). Comparation the quality of recovery after Propofol anesthesia versus Sevoflurane anesthesia for cosmetic surgery. Journal of Disaster Medicine and Burn Injuries, 4, 97-105. https://doi.org/10.54804/yhthvb.4.2024.353

Comparation the quality of recovery after Propofol anesthesia versus Sevoflurane anesthesia for cosmetic surgery

Vo Van Hien1,, Vu Quang Vinh1
1 Le Huu Trac National Burn Hospital

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: Compare the quality of recovery between two groups of patients anesthetized with Propofol or Sevoflurane for cosmetic surgery.
Methods: Prospective, clinical intervention, randomized comparison study on 60 patients divided into 2 groups P (n=30) anesthetized with Propofol and group S (n = 30) anesthetized with Sevoflurane. Evaluate the time points of the recovery phase, adverse events after surgery, compare the quality of recovery using the QoR-40 scale.
Results: Time to regain consciousness, time to full consciousness, time to extubation or laryngeal mask, rate of vomiting, nausea in customers in group P was lower than in group S (p < 0.05); the quality of recovery score according to QoR-40 in group P was statistically higher than in group S (p < 0.05).
Conclusion: Recovery quality after Propofol anesthesia for cosmetic surgery is better than that after Sevoflurane anesthesia.

Article Details

Keywords

Quality of recovery, propofol, sevoflurane, cosmetic surgery

References

1. P. S. Myles*, B. Weitkamp, K. Jones, J. Melick and S. Hensen. Validity and reliability of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-40. British Journal of Anaesthesia 84 (1) (2000): 11-15
2. Kumar G, Stendall C, Mistry R, Gurusamy K, Walker D. A comparison of total intravenous anesthesia using propofol with sevoflurane or desflurane in ambulatory surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. Anesthesia. 2014; 69(10):1138-50.
3. Hofer CK, Zollinger A, Buchi S, Klaghofer R, Serafino D, Buhlmann S, et al. Patient well-being after general anesthesia: a prospective, randomized, controlled multi-centre trial comparing intravenous and inhalation anesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2003;91(5):631-7.
4. Fassoulaki A, Melemeni A, Paraskeva A, Siafaka I, Sarantopoulos C. Postoperative pain and analgesic requirements after anesthesia with sevoflurane, desflurane or propofol. Anesth Analg. 2008;107(5):1715-9.
5. Li M, Mei W, Wang P, Yu Y, Qian W, Zhang ZG, et al. Propofol reduces early post-operative pain after gynecological laparoscopy. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012;56(3):368-75.
6. Fredman B, Nathanson MH, Smith I, Wang J, Klein K, White P. Sevoflurane for outpatient anesthesia: a comparison with Propofol. Anesth Analg. 1995; 81(4):823-8.
7. Brioni JD, Varughese S, Ahmed R, Bein B. A clinical review of inhalation anesthesia with sevoflurane: from early research to emerging topics. J Anesth. 2017;31(5):764-78.
8. Nguyễn Thị Diệu Linh, Hoàng Văn Bách, Công Quyết Thắng. So sánh hiệu quả gây mê theo nồng độ đích của Et Control- Sevoflurane với TCI - Propofol dưới chỉ dẫn của điện não hóa số. Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam. 530, 1B (tháng 9 2023). DOI:https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v530i1B.6716.
9. Myles PS, Weitkamp B, Jones K, et al. Validity and reliability of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-40. British Journal of Anaesthesia 84 (1): 11–15 (2000).
10. Hofer CK, Zollinger A, Buchi S, Klaghofer R, Serafino D, Buhlmann S, et al. Patient well-being after general anesthesia: a prospective, randomized, controlled multi-centre trial comparing intravenous and inhalation anesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2003;91(5):631-7.
11. Vasileiou I, Xanthos T, Koudouna E, Perrea D, Klonaris C, Katsargyris A, et al. Propofol: a review of its non-anaesthetic effects. Eur J Pharmacol. 2009; 605(1-3):1-8.
12. Li KY, Xiao C, Xiong M, Delphin E, Ye JH. Nanomolar propofol stimulates glutamate transmission to dopamine neurons: a possible mechanism of abuse potential? J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2008;325(1):165–74.
13. Yoo YC, Bai SJ, Lee KY, Shin S, Choi EK, Lee JW. Total intravenous anesthesia with propofol reduces postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Yonsei Med J. 2012; 53(6):1197-202.
14. Barann M, Göthert M, Fink K, Bönisch H. Inhibition by anaesthetics of 14 Cguanidinium flux through the voltage-gated sodium channel and the cation channel of the 5-HT 3 receptor of N1E-115 neuroblastoma cells. Naunyn Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol. 1993;347(2):125-32.
15. Gilliland HE, Armstrong MA, Carabine U, McMurray TJ. The choice of anesthetic maintenance technique influences the antiinflammatory cytokine response to abdominal surgery. Anesth Analg. 1997;85(6):1394-8.
16. Crippa J, Mari GM, Miranda A, Costanzi AT, Maggioni D. Surgical stress response and enhanced recovery after laparoscopic surgery - a systematic review. Chirurgia (Bucur). 2018;113(4):455-63.
17. Ledowski T, Paech MJ, Patel B, Schug SA. Bronchial mucus transport velocity in patients receiving propofol and remifentanil versus sevoflurane and remifentanil anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2006;102(5):1427-30.