Evaluation of the effectiveness of ECMO in patients with severe progressive acute respiratory failure in the Intensive Care Unit of 175 Military Hospital

Bui Duc Thanh1,, Tran Quoc Viet1
1 175 Military Hospital

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of ECMO in the treatment of patients with severe progressive acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).
Subjects and methods: This was a controlled interventional, longitudinal descriptive study including 102 patients diagnosed with severe ARDS. Among them, 51 patients were treated with ECMO and 51 patients received conventional treatment in the Intensive Care Unit of Military Hospital 175 from May 2023 to December 2024.
Results: A comparison between the 51 ECMO-treated patients and 51 control patients with severe ARDS revealed that the two groups were comparable in baseline characteristics (mean PaO₂/FiO₂: 58.3 vs. 56.7, p = 0.58). ECMO demonstrated superior outcomes, including a significantly lower 60-day mortality rate (33.3% vs. 49.0%, p = 0.047), a greater number of ventilator-free days (18.6 ± 7.3 vs. 12.3 ± 6.9, p = 0.002), and a more rapid improvement in multiple organ dysfunction (SOFA score on day 7: 6.4 ± 2.5 vs. 8.1 ± 2.7, p = 0.011; on day 14: 4.2 ± 1.9 vs. 6.7 ± 2.5, p = 0.004). However, the ECMO group had a higher incidence of bleeding requiring blood transfusion (45.1% vs. 25.5%, p = 0.032). Notably, the mortality rate among control patients who required rescue ECMO was as high as 61.5%.
Conclusion: ECMO is an effective treatment modality for patients with severe ARDS, offering improved 60-day survival, increased ventilator-free days, and earlier resolution of multiple organ failure. Nevertheless, careful consideration is required when indicating ECMO due to the elevated risk of bleeding complications.

Article Details

References

1. Combes A., Hajage D., Capellier G., et al. (2018). Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. New England Journal of Medicine, 378(21), 1965-1975.
2. Peek G.J., Mugford M., Tiruvoipati R., et al. (2009). Efficacy and economic assessment of conventional ventilatory support versus extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe adult respiratory failure (CESAR): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. The Lancet, 374(9698), 1351-1363.
3. Matthay M.A. (2019). ECMO in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. The Lancet Respiratory Medicine, 7(2), 106-108.
4. Shah R.D. and Wunderink R.G. (2017). Viral Pneumonia and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Clin Chest Med, 38(1), 113-125.
5. Assanangkornchai N., Vichitkunakorn P., and Bhurayanontachai R. (2019). Characteristics and Outcomes of Severe ARDS Patients Receiving ECMO in Southern Thailand. Clin Med Insights Circ Respir Pulm Med, 13, 1179548419885137.
6. Hendrickson K.W., Peltan I.D., and Brown S.M. (2021). The Epidemiology of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Before and After Coronavirus Disease 2019. Crit Care Clin, 37(4), 703-716.
7. Combes A., Peek G.J., Hajage D., et al. (2020). ECMO for severe ARDS: systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med, 46(11), 2048–2057.
8. Nguyễn Hoàng Sơn, Nguyễn Quang Hòa (2024), Bước đầu áp dụng kỹ thuật ECMO - VV điều trị bệnh nhân suy hô hấp cấp nặng tại khoa Hồi sức tích cực Bệnh viện Phổi trung ương năm 2023, Tạp chí Y học cộng đồng, 65(3), 332-338
9. Đồng Phú Khiêm, Vũ Đình Phú, Trịnh Thị Nhung và cộng sự (2023), Kết quả điều trị bệnh nhân COVID-19 được can thiệp ECMO tại Bệnh viện Nhiệt đới Trung ương, Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam, 529(1B), 65-69.
10. Kalbhenn J. and Zieger B. (2022). Bleeding During Veno-Venous ECMO: Prevention and Treatment. Front Med, 9.