Nutritional status and body composition in patients with Marjolin's ulcer: A cross-sectional study of 32 cases
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: To describe nutritional status, body composition, and associations between malnutrition and disease characteristics in patients with Marjolin’s ulcer.
Subjects and methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 32 patients with histologically confirmed Marjolin’s ulcer at the Le Huu Trac National Burn Hospital and Military Hospital 175 from January 2022 to December 2025. Nutritional risk was screened using NRS-2002, malnutrition was diagnosed according to GLIM criteria, and body composition was assessed using TANITA.
Results: Mean age was 54.7 ± 11.8 years; 84.4% of lesions developed from burn scars. Mean BMI was 20.5 ± 2.8 kg/m², and 28.1% were underweight. Men had higher muscle mass, whereas women had higher body fat percentage and fat mass (p <0.05). Nutritional risk according to NRS-2002 was present in 43.8%; malnutrition according to GLIM was present in 40.6%, including 28.1% moderate and 12.5% severe malnutrition. Malnourished patients had lower albumin, hemoglobin, lymphocyte count, and PNI, but higher CRP (p <0.05). In univariable analysis, malnutrition was associated with maximum lesion diameter ≥5 cm, lesion area ≥50 cm², and local infection (p <0.05).
Conclusion: Nutritional risk and malnutrition were common in patients with Marjolin’s ulcer. Nutritional screening and assessment should be performed before treatment.
Keywords
Marjolin's ulcer, nutritional status, body composition
Article Details
References
2. Arends J, Bachmann P, Baracos V, Barthelemy N, Bertz H, Bozzetti F, et al. ESPEN guidelines on nutrition in cancer patients. Clin Nutr. 2017;36(1):11-48. doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2016.07.015.
3. Cederholm T, Jensen GL, Correia MITD, Gonzalez MC, Fukushima R, Higashiguchi T, et al. GLIM criteria for the diagnosis of malnutrition: a consensus report from the global clinical nutrition community. Clin Nutr. 2019;38(1):1-9. doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2018.08.002.
4. Kondrup J, Rasmussen HH, Hamberg O, Stanga Z. Nutritional risk screening (NRS 2002): a new method based on an analysis of controlled clinical trials. Clin Nutr. 2003;22(3):321-336. doi:10.1016/S0261-5614(02)00214-5.
5. Kyle UG, Bosaeus I, De Lorenzo AD, Deurenberg P, Elia M, Gómez JM, et al. Bioelectrical impedance analysis - part I: review of principles and methods. Clin Nutr. 2004;23(5):1226-1243. doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2004.06.004.
6. WHO Expert Consultation. Appropriate body-mass index for Asian populations and its implications for policy and intervention strategies. Lancet. 2004;363(9403):157-163. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(03)15268-3.
7. Onodera T, Goseki N, Kosaki G. [Prognostic nutritional index in gastrointestinal surgery of malnourished cancer patients]. Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi. 1984;85(9):1001-1005.
8. Muscaritoli M, Arends J, Bachmann P, Baracos V, Barthelemy N, Bertz H, et al. ESPEN practical guideline: Clinical nutrition in cancer. Clin Nutr. 2021;40(5):2898-2913. doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2021.02.005.
9. Evans DC, Corkins MR, Malone A, Miller S, Mogensen KM, Guenter P, et al. The use of visceral proteins as nutrition markers: an ASPEN position paper. Nutr Cin Pract. 2021;36(1):22-28. doi:10.1002/ncp.10588.