Treatment Outcomes of Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections Treated with Ceftazidime-Avibactam in Severely Burned Patients with Sepsis
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the antimicrobial susceptibility of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria to ceftazidime-avibactam and the clinical outcomes of ceftazidime-avibactam therapy in severely burned patients with sepsis.
Subjects and methods: Thirty-four clinical specimens obtained from severely burned patients yielding multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (P. aeruginosa and K. pneumoniae) underwent antimicrobial susceptibility testing using multidrug-resistance card. Forty-nine patients with sepsis treated in the Intensive Care Unit, suspected or confirmed to be infected with P. aeruginosa or K. pneumoniae, received ceftazidime-avibactam either empirically or according to antimicrobial susceptibility results.
Results: P. aeruginosa demonstrated the highest susceptibility to ceftazidime-avibactam (61.11%), which was higher than that to ceftolozane-tazobactam (27.78%) and imipenem-relebactam (27.78%). Among the novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (N-BL/BLIs), ceftazidime-avibactam showed the highest susceptibility rate against K. pneumoniae (56.25%). The minimum inhibitory concentrations of ceftazidime-avibactam and imipenem-relebactam against P. aeruginosa and K. pneumoniae were the lowest among the N-BL/BLIs tested.
Among the 49 patients with sepsis, 91.84% developed septic shock. The predominant pathogen was P. aeruginosa (69.23% of blood culture isolates and 90.91% of wound culture isolates). The median duration of ceftazidime-avibactam therapy in burn patients with sepsis was 9 days. The mortality rate was 61.22%.
Conclusion: P. aeruginosa and K. pneumoniae remained highly susceptible to ceftazidime-avibactam. The mortality rate among burn patients with sepsis treated with ceftazidime-avibactam was 61.22%.
Article Details
Keywords
Burns, sepsis, ceftazidime-avibactam
References
2. Lê Quốc Vương, Nguyễn Như Lâm, Trần Đình Hùng và cộng sự. Đặc điểm nhiễm khuẩn đa kháng kháng sinh trên bệnh nhân bỏng nặng. Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam 2026; 560(3):87-92; https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v560i3.17944.
3. Martin K, Arif F, Sultan-Ali I et al. Analysis of ceftazidime/avibactam use for treating carbapenem-resistant infections in critically ill patients with thermal or inhalation injuries. Journal of Burn Care Research 2022; 43(4):759-765.
4. Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016; 315(8):801-810.
5. Magiorakos AP, Srinivasan A, Carey RB, Carmeli Y, Falagas ME, Giske CG, et al. Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: an international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance. Clinical Microbiology and Infection. 2012; 18(3):268-281.
6. Bassetti M, Vena A, Sepulcri C et al. Treatment of bloodstream infections due to Gram-negative bacteria with difficult-to-treat resistance. Antibiotics 2020; 9(9):632.
7. Blomquist KC, Nix DE. A critical evaluation of newer β-lactam antibiotics for treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. Annals of Pharmacotherapy 2021; 55(8):1010-1024.
8. Ruedas-López A, Alonso-García I, Lasarte-Monterrubio C et al. Selection of AmpC β-lactamase variants and metallo-β-lactamases leading to ceftolozane/tazobactam and ceftazidime/avibactam resistance during treatment of MDR/XDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 2022; 66(2):e02067-02021.
9. Shields RK, Kline EG, Squires KM et al. In vitro activity of cefiderocol against Pseudomonas aeruginosa demonstrating evolved resistance to novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors. JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance 2023; 5(5):dlad107.
10. Megdiche Z, Lamloumi M, Maamar B et al. In vitro activity of ceftazidime-avibactam and ceftolozane-tazobactam against clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Results from a trauma center and burn unit in Tunisia. Annals of Burns and Fire Disasters 2025; 38(1):31-37.
11. Conil J-M, Georges B, Ravat F et al. Ceftazidime dosage recommendations in burn patients: from a population pharmacokinetic approach to clinical practice via Monte Carlo simulations. Clinical therapeutics 2013; 35(10):1603-1612.
12. Herbin SR, Barber KE, Isaacson AR et al. When more is still not enough: a case of ceftazidime-avibactam resistance in a burn patient. Journal of burn care & research 2022; 43(2):474-478.