Association between packed red blood cell transfusion and clinical outcomes in patients with severe burns
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the association between packed red blood cell transfusion and clinical outcomes in patients with severe burns.
Methods: A retrospective descriptive study was conducted on 627 patients with severe burns who were treated in the Department of Emergency and Intensive Care, Vietnam National Burn Hospital, from January 2021 to December 2025.
Results: The overall mortality rate was 24.88%. The total volume of blood products transfused during hospitalization was 1.02 (0.57–1.63) mL/kg/%burn extent. Age, burn extent, deep burn area, inhalation injury, and the volume of blood products transfused per kg body weight per %burn extent were independently associated with mortality (all p < 0.01). The volume of blood products transfused per kg body weight per %burn extent demonstrated fair prognostic performance for mortality (AUC = 0.70), with a sensitivity of 64.74%, specificity of 64.33%, and an optimal cut-off value of 1.16 mL/kg/%burn exent. Survival probability was significantly lower in patients receiving >1.16 mL/kg/% burn exent of blood products compared with those receiving ≤1.16 mL/kg/% burn exent (χ² = 18.48, p < 0.001). Among survivors, the volume of blood products transfused per kg body weight per % burn exent was independently associated with length of hospital stay (β = 4.58, p < 0.001).
Conclusions: The volume of blood products transfused per kg body weight per % burn exent is independently associated with mortality and length of hospital stay among survivors with severe burns.
Keywords
severe burns, blood transfusion, mortality
Article Details
References
2. Palmieri TL, Holmes IV JH, Arnoldo B et al. Transfusion requirement in burn care evaluation (TRIBE): a multicenter randomized prospective trial of blood transfusion in major burn injury. Annals of surgery 2017; 266(4):595-602.
3. Curinga G, Jain A, Feldman M et al. Red blood cell transfusion following burn. Burns 2011; 37(5):742-752.
4. Palmieri TL, Caruso DM, Foster KN et al. Effect of blood transfusion on outcome after major burn injury: a multicenter study. Critical care medicine 2006; 34(6):1602-1607.
5. Corwin HL, Gettinger A, Pearl RG et al. The CRIT Study: anemia and blood transfusion in the critically ill—current clinical practice in the United States. Critical care medicine 2004; 32(1):39-52.
6. Carson JL, Terrin ML, Noveck H et al. Liberal or restrictive transfusion in high-risk patients after hip surgery. New England Journal of Medicine 2011; 365(26):2453-2462.
7. Criswell KK, Gamelli RL Establishing transfusion needs in burn patients. The American journal of surgery 2005; 189(3):324-326.
8. Jian J, Yu P, Zhengli C et al. Determining transfusion use in major burn patients: A retrospective review and analysis from 2009 to 2019. Burns 2022; 48(5):1104-1111.
9. Du Y, Xia Y, You C et al. Impact of red blood cell transfusion in massive burn: a multicenter cohort study. Scientific Reports 2025; 15(1):6196.
10. Dirjayanto VJ, Anjani JV, Ariviani TP et al. Restrictive vs liberal blood transfusion strategy for patients with burn trauma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. British Journal of Hospital Medicine 2023; 84(5):1-6.
11. Kaserer A, Rössler J, Slankamenac K et al. Impact of allogeneic blood transfusions on clinical outcomes in severely burned patients. Burns 2020; 46(5):1083-1090.
12. Storch EK, Custer BS, Jacobs MR et al. Review of current transfusion therapy and blood banking practices. Blood reviews 2019; 38:100593.
13. Raasveld SJ, De Bruin S, Reuland MC et al. Red blood cell transfusion in the intensive care unit. JAMA 2023; 330(19):1852-1861.
14. Zeroual N, Blin C, Saour M et al. Restrictive transfusion strategy after cardiac surgery: role of central venous oxygen saturation trigger: a randomized controlled trial. Anesthesiology 2021; 134(3):370-380.
15. Odutayo A, Desborough MJ, Trivella M et al. Restrictive versus liberal blood transfusion for gastrointestinal bleeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology 2017; 2(5):354-360.