Article Sidebar

Issue: No. 3 (2026)
Section: Articles
Date Published: 28/10/2026
Views 0
How to Cite
Hoang, D. T., & Mai, X. T. (2026). Delayed admission following treatment with topical preparations of unknown origin in two patients with burns: A report of two cases. Journal of Disaster Medicine and Burn Injuries, 3. https://jbdmp.vn/index.php/yhthvb/article/view/583

Delayed admission following treatment with topical preparations of unknown origin in two patients with burns: A report of two cases

Hoang Dinh Thanh1, , Mai Xuan Thao1
1 Le Huu Trac National Burn Hospital

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: To describe the clinical course and management challenges in two patients with burns admitted after treatment with topical preparations of unknown origin, and to identify lessons for practice.
Case presentation: A married couple sustained gas-flame burns on May 30, 2026. According to their accounts, concerns about pain and surgery led them to seek treatment at a local facility using topical preparations of unknown origin before hospital admission 7 and 11 days after injury, respectively. Adherent residue, purulent discharge and malodor were described. The 48-year-old man had burns involving 29% of the total body surface area (TBSA), described as superficial and deep partial-thickness burns, and received inpatient care for 20 days. The 43-year-old woman had burns involving 28% TBSA, including partial-thickness and full-thickness injuries; deep burns involving 18% TBSA. The manuscript reports a positive culture for Staphylococcus haemolyticus, two skin-grafting procedures and a 35-day hospital stay.
Conclusion: The two patients were admitted 7 and 11 days after injury with adherent topical residue and findings suggestive of burn wound infection; one underwent two skin-grafting procedures. These cases emphasize timely specialist burn assessment and caution regarding unverified topical preparations.

Keywords

burn; delayed admission; herbal preparation; burn wound infection; skin grafting.

Article Details

References

1. ISBI Practice Guidelines Committee; Steering Subcommittee; Advisory Subcommittee. ISBI Practice Guidelines for Burn Care. Burns. 2016;42(5):953-1021. doi:10.1016/j.burns.2016.05.013.
2. Greenhalgh DG. Management of burns. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(24):2349-2359. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1807442.
3. Wong L, Rajandram R, Allorto N. Systematic review of excision and grafting in burns: comparing outcomes of early and late surgery in low and high-income countries. Burns. 2021;47(8):1705-1713. doi:10.1016/j.burns.2021.07.001.
4. De La Tejera G, Corona K, Efejuku T, Keys P, et al. Early wound excision within three days decreases risks of wound infection and death in burned patients. Burns. 2023;49(8):1816-1822. doi:10.1016/j.burns.2023.06.003.
5. Ong YS, Samuel M, Song C. Meta-analysis of early excision of burns. Burns. 2006;32(2):145-150. doi:10.1016/j.burns.2005.09.005.
6. Muangman P, Sullivan SR, Honari S, Engrav LH, et al. The optimal time for early excision in major burn injury. J Med Assoc Thai. 2006;89(1):29-36.
7. Church D, Elsayed S, Reid O, Winston B, et al. Burn wound infections. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2006;19(2):403-434. doi:10.1128/CMR.19.2.403-434.2006.
8. Rowan MP, Cancio LC, Elster EA, Burmeister DM, Rose LF, Natesan S, et al. Burn wound healing and treatment: review and advancements. Crit Care. 2015;19:243. doi:10.1186/s13054-015-0961-2.